“There’s too much at stake.”







Introduction: October 13th last year, I published a statement from Ruth during the outset of Israel’s retaliation to the “October 7th” attack. Earlier that year in the summer of 2023, I published a chapter from a book, Bodies of Salt, she has been working on since she visited Palestine. This second statement focuses on the responsibilities we may have as subjects of the U.S. empire, specifically that of voting. Though I am disaffected from voting as are nearly half of Americans, I’m glad to share her thoughts on the massacre and displacement that has continued throughout the past year. To contribute a few of my own thoughts, I would argue that voting on the appeal of defeating another candidate is not a decision and, if it were, this act would have no basis in principles or convictions. Ruth is expressing here what has been said by Muslim and Palestinian Americans as well as many others, but I think she makes the distinction clear between voting as a reaction and voting as a decision. While this piece focuses on government representation, we can also apply this distinction to any other political act. I follow Professor Benjamin Studebaker with his analysis in “The Way Is Shut,” which tracks the impossibilty of affecting structural change through liberal democracies, such as the United States. Voting can be used as a deterrent for harm, but I think Ruth’s intervention is useful in rupturing the recurring nausea of political campaigns that offer us a false freedom. If you are going to vote, if at all, perhaps vote for someone or something, but know that this act is not where we begin or end, but where we are held by the booth or ballot as in a purgatory, and without our Virgil. The promise of a future without state slaughter and the slow slaughter of our daily struggles I believe lies in labor. The work is, after all, taking place in our work. Once again, I’ve shared resources Ruth suggested to me below. I will also leave you with a passage from Kirkegaard’s Either/Or (”Equilibrium Between the Aesthetic and the Ethical”) that suggests to me we answer the false freedom of voting with neither/nor:

“Take note, then, my young friend, this life is despair; hide it from others if you will, from yourself you cannot hide it, it is despair. And yet in another sense this life is not despair. You are too frivolous to despair; and you are too melancholy not to come in contact with despair. You are like a woman giving birth and yet you are forever putting off the moment and remain constantly in pain. Were a woman in travail to get the idea that she might give birth to a monster, or were she to wonder what it really was she was about to give birth to, her case would be not unlike yours. Her attempt to stay the course of nature would be unavailing, but yours indeed can succeed; for what a person gives birth to in a spiritual sense is a creative urge of the will, and that is in man’s own power. What then is it you are afraid of? You are not going to give birth to another human being, you will give birth only to yourself. And yet, as I know well, there is a gravity in this which perturbs the whole soul; to be conscious of oneself in one’s eternal validity is a moment more significant than everything in the world. It is as though you were caught and trapped and now could never again escape, either in time or eternity; it is as though you lost yourself, as though you ceased to be; it is as though the next moment you would rue it and yet it cannot be undone. It is a grave and significant moment when one binds oneself as the one whose memory no time shall efface, when in an eternal and unfailing sense one becomes aware of oneself as the person one is. And yet, one can still let it be! Look: here, then, is an either/or.”

- alex benedict, 11/3/24




                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



This is the sentence I have been hearing liberals offer in defense of their unenthusiastic choice to vote for Kamala Harris. These words usually come with a sigh, a shake of the head, a knowing look of resignation. “Of course, I hate what’s happening to Palestinians, and I will keep calling my senators about a ceasefire, but it’s just not the right time to vote third party.”



                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



I have been too thoroughly trained in Southern politeness to speak my mind in these conversations, but after a year of watching Democrats cheerlead the slaughter of my loved ones’ friends and families in Palestine, I cannot keep my anger in check any longer. Yes, there is much at stake in this election, and as citizens of the most powerful and destructive empire in the world, we must also think about what is at stake for the rest of the world. If you think that something worse than the genocide in Gaza could possibly happen to you, the American voter, under a Trump presidency, take a good long look at the news from Palestine, absorb the level of suffering that the American empire subjects people to, and bring yourself down to fucking earth.



                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



What is “at stake” is the ability of an elected official to facilitate a genocide and suffer absolutely zero consequences from their constituents. In the last year, the Biden-Harris administration has sent $17.9 billion to the Israeli military, vetoed numerous UN ceasefire resolutions, and offered endless rhetorical cover for their greatest ally as it bombs, starves, and massacres a trapped group of people that is fifty percent children. It has become perfectly clear that no world leaders have the guts or the power to hold Americans responsible for their horrifying, world-destroying depravity. International law is a sham when its application is dictated by the very criminals it should protect the world from. Our calls to Congress reach the ears of Democrats and Republicans alike who are paid by the Israel lobby to slaughter hundreds of thousands of people and then lie to the people they know will keep voting for them no matter what. The only significant challenges to the American Zionist killing machine are the armed resistance movements and direct actions from the citizens of the empire, whose ability to hit the nerve of imperialism is revealed in the hyper-militarized force deployed (under Democrats and Republicans alike) to suppress the elevation of our collective consciousness. A year goes by, and the imperial genocide has only, somehow, gotten worse, with no one able to stop it.



                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



Palestinians have resisted colonial occupation for over seventy-six years, and they will continue until they realize their freedom. Liberation is a process extending long before and after this election year. Yet, in this moment when international law, world leaders, armed resistance, and mass protests have fallen short of stopping the genociders, the greatest threat to the war criminals is the voting citizens of the US empire. We have the precious ability to hold Harris accountable for her unforgivable crimes and establish a more humane precedent for the future of American politics. If you vote for her, you send a clear message that a politician can commit a genocide, using billions of your tax dollars, against your stated wishes, and you will still vote for them. Remember in 2016 when Trump said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any voters? Liberals decried the rote obedience of conservatives to their brainwashing dictator. Yet, it appears that Harris can facilitate the murders of over 186,000 people, the starvation of over two million people, the reduction of children to bags of body parts, and the obliteration of an entire society, and liberals will still vote for her. Let’s repeat that. A politician can kill over 186,000 people, starve two million people, reduce children to bags of body parts, and obliterate an entire society, and you will still vote for her. Even though the majority of Americans say they want a ceasefire and arms embargo on Israel, they will vote for the person unconditionally arming Israel. The Democrats only stay in power because they have shackled our minds and guts in subservience and powerlessness. Remind me: who is the villain? Who is the fascist? Who is the threat to democracy?. What exactly is at stake?



                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



Perhaps we are numb to the figures, so I will remind you of an individual. Shaban al-Dalou, nineteen years old, burned to death beside his mother in an American Zionist air strike on his tent outside Al-Aqsa Hospital. May God rest their souls. I feel the need to keep repeating myself, because you don’t seem to get it. The Biden-Harris-Netanyahu administration burned a nineteen-year-old and his mother to death in a tent on the grounds of a besieged hospital. There is nothing more evil than genocide, but liberals must not believe this since they keep calling Harris the “lesser of two evils..” If you agree that there is nothing more evil than genocide and still think Harris is a more moral choice than Trump, then your connection to the world beyond your American experience is horribly severed. 



                                      “There’s too much at stake.”



Perhaps the word genocide has become too common in our speech. We wake up to it on our phones every day. We use the word in daily conversation to reference what is happening in Palestine. We witness the genocide in one moment and go grocery shopping in the next. It has become something that we, the outside observers, are accustomed to—just like we watch the trucks on the highway carry living beings to slaughter and fail to disrupt the flow of traffic. One year in, we are accepting that genocide is something that happens and that we have no hope of ending. We will call our right-wing senators and drop pennies in GoFundMes and accept that this is the best we can do. But I promise you that genocide does not become more normal or bearable or acceptable for those who experience it. For them, an end to genocide, occupation, and colonization is non-negotiable. So, maybe we need to start using a different word, one to put some fire under our asses to actually fight the status quo. Shaban and his mother burned to death in an American-Zionist Holocaust, funded by American taxpayers. The word Holocaust contains what the white West knows as the worst things that humans can do to humans. So I will repeat: Kamala Harris is funding and defending and therefore committing a Holocaust, and she has the audacity to pretend that she isn’t. History will remember her and all our government officials complicit in this act among the ranks of the Nazis. No excuse will absolve those who allow this slaughter machine to continue by voting for its operator.



                                        “There’s too much at stake.”




What exactly is at stake? The Democratic Party is relying on your fear for your perceived safety to override your conscience and belief in the power of people to hold politicians accountable and create the world we want to live in. If you vote for Trump, you reward a white supremacist, xenophobic rapist with another period of power. If you vote for Harris, you reward the “girlboss” of a modern day, ongoing, ever-worsening Holocaust with another period of power, and you surrender the only leverage you truly have over your government. Just as the worker’s power comes from their ability to withhold their labor from oppressive bosses, the citizen’s power is found in their ability to withhold their vote from undeserving politicians. The boss does not survive without their workers; the politician does not survive without their voters. The two party system only continues as long as its citizens believe it is their only option. You can vote for the empire to continue chugging us toward a world with more Holocausts and climate catastrophes. Blue or red, it doesn’t matter. They are both bullies who support fascists and dictators, and they are paid by the same corporations and PACs to convince you to vote for your own demise. Voting blue is not something for liberals to sigh knowingly about, as if they are good people forced to do something bad. You have other options, the only ones with any power to challenge the American empire, the ones that the Holocaust architects are terrified of. You can vote for the world you want to live in. You can vote with hope, courage, and radical optimism. You can vote for a living Palestine, a living Sudan, a living Congo, a living Turtle Island, a living world. You can vote with a willingness to sacrifice for a future without Holocausts.




                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



I have chosen this other option, along with the over forty percent of the American Muslim population who polling shows are voting third party. In many of the swing states, polling indicates that support for Green Party candidate Jill Stein surpasses Harris. Democrats cannot win without Muslim votes, and Harris doesn’t have enough of them. The Abandon Harris movement ensured this on November 1, 2023, back when they abandoned Biden over his unwavering support for the fledgling Holocaust, and on October 7, 2024, when they unified the power of the dissenters by endorsing Jill Stein, an anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist Jewish woman and Rudolph Ware, her Black Muslim running mate, for the presidential ticket. The American Muslim population has been the only group principled enough for a significant number of them to act in line with the belief that a world with genocide is unacceptable. They find allies in people of all backgrounds who have the guts to hold our government accountable for the hellfire it rains onto the rest of the world. We are united in our belief that we have to create the world we want to live in and now is exactly the right time to do it. 


                                        
                                        “There’s too much at stake.”



Remember what is at stake: a future where American politicians can obliterate a group of people and their citizens will reward them with another term in office. A world where genocide is posited as a lesser evil because it happens to someone other than you. A system that denies you healthcare, housing, education, and rest as it uses your money to decimate hospitals, homes, schools, and human beings in their sleep. I don’t want to live in that world, and I know you don’t either. I’m not asking you to take up arms or set yourself on fire outside a Zionist embassy. I am asking you to do the bare minimum, to fill in a bubble beside the name of a person who is not a white supremacist, xenophobic rapist or the proud puppeteer of the deadliest empire the world has ever seen. Perhaps, once we have learned to vote with our consciences, we will be ready to act for the oppressed without fear. So, I am asking you to vote with a liberated consciousness. Vote with hope. Vote with the power to hold your scum-of-the-earth politicians accountable like no one else in the burning world can. Vote with a goddamn spine. There is too much at stake for us to cower.






-- Ruth Jeffers, 11/4/2024




*These thoughts are the product of five months spent in Palestine and a subsequent year studying the history, following the news, and listening to people who have been thinking about and experiencing this much longer than I have. I recommend the following resources if you are unfamiliar with the context in which the present moment is situated, and I recommend the below media sources that I follow for humane, accurate, and contextualized information about current events.






Take action:



  • URGENT: Tell Congress to stop fueling violence - JVP (jewishvoiceforpeace.org)








Articles:













Organizations to follow:


  • Jewish Voice for Peace

  • The IMEU

  • Adalah

  • +972 Magazine

  • The Freedom Theatre

  • Breaking the Silence

  • If Not Now

  • Mondoweiss

  • B’tselem






Individuals to follow:



  • Awdah Al-Hathalean

  • Noura Erakat

  • Plestia Alaqad




Other news sources (remember nothing is perfect):


  • Al Jazeera

  • Eye on Palestine